Matching a tunnel Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel CC 2013 against a modified vee Alumacraft Vs and Ts T14V 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Alumacraft Vs and Ts T14V 2011 measures 14,0 feet overall (2011), giving it roughly 12,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel CC 2013 at 2,0 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel CC 2013 tips the scales at 1 135 lbs — 1 117 lbs more than the Alumacraft Vs and Ts T14V 2011 at 18 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 130 hp, the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel CC 2013 has a 115-hp advantage over the Alumacraft Vs and Ts T14V 2011's 15-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel CC 2013 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Alumacraft Vs and Ts T14V 2011 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel CC 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Vs and Ts T14V 2011 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 9 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel CC 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.