Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel  2007 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007
2007
View full specs →

Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 vs Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 and the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 at 2,0 ft versus Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007 at 2,0 ft. At 11 lbs and 85 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 has a 55-hp advantage over the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 and its 115-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007 with its 60-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelMV 2072 AW SC
ModelMV 2072 AW Tunnel
Model Year2009
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam94 in
Beam96 in
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches94
Beam - Inches96
Weight - Detail1,100 lbs
Weight - Detail850 lbs
Weight - kg498.95
Weight - kg385.55
Weight - lbs.11
Weight - lbs.85
Width [transom] - Detail72 in
Width [transom] - Detail72 in
Height - Detail27 in
Height - Detail30 in
Height - Meters0.69
Height - Meters0.76
Height - Inches27
Height - Inches3
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet2
Length overall - Detail20 ft
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters6.1
Length overall - Meters6.1
Length overall - Inches24
Length overall - Inches24
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail16 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters60.57
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal16
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max115 hp
Engine max60 hp 90 hp with optional console
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,100 lbs
Maximum capacity1,550 lbs
Maximum people8
Maximum people8

Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 vs Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 or the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007?
The Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007 is the longer of the two at 2,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 or the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007?
For trailering, the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 has the edge at 11 lbs dry weight versus 85 lbs for the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 is rated to a maximum of 115 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007 tops out at 60 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007 measures 96" wide, compared to 94" for the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 and Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW SC 2009 and the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2007 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.