Matching a flat Alumacraft MV 1860 AW Special Tunnel 2008 against a deep vee Alumacraft Tournament Pro 185 CS 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft MV 1860 AW Special Tunnel 2008 at 18,0 ft versus Alumacraft Tournament Pro 185 CS 2009 at 18,0 ft. At 105 lbs and 168 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 185 CS 2009 has a 60-hp advantage over the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW Special Tunnel 2008's 115-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 185 CS 2009 carries 38 gallons versus 16 gallons in the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW Special Tunnel 2008. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft MV 1860 AW Special Tunnel 2008 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 185 CS 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.