Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC  2010 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006
2006
View full specs →

Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 vs Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 and the Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 at 17,0 ft versus Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006 at 17,0 ft. At 83 lbs and 83 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 75 hp for the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 and 75 hp for the Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 and Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelMV 1756 AW SC
ModelV-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC
Model Year201
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam83 in. (2.11 m)
Beam83 in
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Inches83
Beam - Inches83
Weight - Detail830 lbs. (376 kg)
Weight - Detail830 lbs
Weight - kg376.48
Weight - kg376.48
Weight - lbs.83
Weight - lbs.83
Width [transom] - Detail56 in. (1.42 m)
Width [transom] - Detail56 in
Height - Detail24 in. (.61 m)
Height - Detail24 in
Height - Meters0.61
Height - Meters0.61
Height - Inches24
Height - Inches24
Height [transom]21 in. (.53 m)
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Meters5.2
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet17
Length overall - Detail17 ft. (5.2 m)
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Inches204
Length overall - Inches204
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.102 in. (2.6 mm)
Hull thickness.102 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail16 gal. (60.6 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters60.57
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal16
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max75 hp (56 kW)
Engine max75 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,300 lbs. (589.7 kg)
Maximum capacity825 lbs
Maximum people5
Maximum people5

Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 vs Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 or the Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006?
The Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 or the Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006?
For trailering, the Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006 has the edge at 83 lbs dry weight versus 83 lbs for the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 and Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006 share an 83 in. (2.11 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Are the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 and Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 and the Alumacraft V-Bow 1756 AW Tunnel SC 2006 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.