Matching a modified vee Alumacraft MV 1650 AW 2013 against a other Alumacraft V14 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft MV 1650 AW 2013 at 16,0 ft versus Alumacraft V14 2009 at 14,0 ft. At 47 lbs and 23 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 40 hp for the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW 2013 and 20 hp for the Alumacraft V14 2009. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft V14 2009 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW 2013 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft V14 2009 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft V14 2009 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Alumacraft V14 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 14,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Alumacraft MV 1650 AW 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.