Matching a modified vee Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 against a flat Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel SC 2008 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 at 16,0 ft versus Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel SC 2008 at 16,0 ft. At 68 lbs and 68 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 60 hp for the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 and 60 hp for the Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel SC 2008. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel SC 2008 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 and Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel SC 2008 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.