Alumacraft MV 1650 AW  SC 2007 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft MV 1860 AW   2010 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010
2010
View full specs →

Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 vs Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 and the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 at 16,0 ft versus Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010 at 18,0 ft. At 68 lbs and 68 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 60 hp for the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 and 50 hp for the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 18,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelMV 1650 AW SC
ModelMV 1860 AW
Model Year2007
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam74 in
Beam86 in. (2.18 m)
Beam - Meters1.88
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Inches74
Beam - Inches86
Weight - Detail680 lbs
Weight - Detail680 lbs. (308 kg)
Weight - kg308.44
Weight - kg308.44
Weight - lbs.68
Weight - lbs.68
Width [transom] - Detail50 in
Width [transom] - Detail60 in. (1.52 m)
Height - Detail22 in
Height - Detail25 in. (.64 m)
Height - Meters0.56
Height - Meters0.64
Height - Inches22
Height - Inches25
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]21 in. (.53 m)
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet18
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. (5.5 m)
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches216
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters5.5
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull thickness0.102 in. (2.6 mm)
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max60 hp
Engine max50 hp (37 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity855 lbs
Maximum capacity1,600 lbs. (725.7 kg)
Maximum people5
Maximum people6

Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 vs Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 or the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010?
The Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 or the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010?
For trailering, the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010 has the edge at 68 lbs dry weight versus 68 lbs for the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 is rated to a maximum of 60 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010 measures 86" wide, compared to 74" for the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 and Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW SC 2007 and the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2010 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.