Alumacraft MV  1648 2006 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft MV 1648 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC  2010 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010
2010
View full specs →

Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 vs Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 and the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 at 16,0 ft versus Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 at 17,0 ft. At 28 lbs and 83 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 has a 35-hp advantage over the Alumacraft MV 1648 2006's 40-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 and its 75-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 with its 40-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelMV 1648
ModelMV 1756 AW SC
Model Year2006
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam70 in
Beam83 in. (2.11 m)
Beam - Meters1.78
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Inches7
Beam - Inches83
Weight - Detail280 lbs
Weight - Detail830 lbs. (376 kg)
Weight - kg127.01
Weight - kg376.48
Weight - lbs.28
Weight - lbs.83
Width [transom] - Detail48 in
Width [transom] - Detail56 in. (1.42 m)
Height - Detail21 in
Height - Detail24 in. (.61 m)
Height - Meters0.53
Height - Meters0.61
Height - Inches21
Height - Inches24
Height [transom]15 in. or 20 in
Height [transom]21 in. (.53 m)
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet17
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail17 ft. (5.2 m)
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches204
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters5.2
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.070 in
Hull thickness0.102 in. (2.6 mm)
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max40 hp
Engine max75 hp (56 kW)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail16 gal. (60.6 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters60.57
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal16
Operational Info
StorageCenter bench seat storage
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity1,010 lbs
Maximum capacity1,300 lbs. (589.7 kg)
Maximum people5
Maximum people5

Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 vs Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 or the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010?
The Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 or the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010?
For trailering, the Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 has the edge at 28 lbs dry weight versus 83 lbs for the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 is rated to a maximum of 75 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 tops out at 40 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 measures 83" wide, compared to 7" for the Alumacraft MV 1648 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 and Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft MV 1648 2006 and the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2010 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.