Matching a modified vee Alumacraft MV 1546 AW 2010 against a tunnel Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft MV 1546 AW 2010 at 15,0 ft versus Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 at 18,0 ft. At 34 lbs and 92 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 has a 65-hp advantage over the Alumacraft MV 1546 AW 2010's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft MV 1546 AW 2010 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 1546 AW 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 18,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Alumacraft MV 1546 AW 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.