Matching a deep vee Alumacraft Lunker 165 Tiller 2010 against a modified vee Alumacraft Navigator 165 Tiller 2007 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Lunker 165 Tiller 2010 at 16,5 ft versus Alumacraft Navigator 165 Tiller 2007 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Navigator 165 Tiller 2007 tips the scales at 925 lbs — 859 lbs less than the Alumacraft Lunker 165 Tiller 2010 at 66 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 40 hp for the Alumacraft Lunker 165 Tiller 2010 and 60 hp for the Alumacraft Navigator 165 Tiller 2007. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Lunker 165 Tiller 2010 comes in at 2 lbs per hp versus 15 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Navigator 165 Tiller 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Alumacraft Navigator 165 Tiller 2007 and its 60-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Alumacraft Lunker 165 Tiller 2010 with its 40-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.