Matching a deep vee Alumacraft Lunker 165 Tiller 2009 against a modified vee Alumacraft V-16 (20 in.) 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Lunker 165 Tiller 2009 at 16,0 ft versus Alumacraft V-16 (20 in.) 2012 at 16,6 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft V-16 (20 in.) 2012 tips the scales at 285 lbs — 219 lbs less than the Alumacraft Lunker 165 Tiller 2009 at 66 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 40 hp for the Alumacraft Lunker 165 Tiller 2009 and 25 hp for the Alumacraft V-16 (20 in.) 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Lunker 165 Tiller 2009 comes in at 2 lbs per hp versus 11 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft V-16 (20 in.) 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The Alumacraft Lunker 165 Tiller 2009 and Alumacraft V-16 (20 in.) 2012 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.