Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft Invader 185 2005
2005
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013
2013
View full specs →

Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 vs Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 vs Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 at 18,0 ft versus Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 at 17,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 tips the scales at 575 lbs — 562 lbs less than the Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 at 13 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 has a 100-hp advantage over the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 and its 150-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 with its 50-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelInvader 185
ModelMV 1756 AW
Model Year2005
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam92 in. (2.33 m) Bottom: 67 in. (1.70 m)
Beam83 in
Beam - Meters2.34
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Inches92
Beam - Inches83
Weight - Detail1,300 lbs. (590 kg)
Weight - Detail575 lbs
Weight - kg589.67
Weight - kg260.82
Weight - lbs.13
Weight - lbs.575
Width [transom] - Detail92 in. (2.33 m)
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height - Detail23 in. (0.58 m)
Height - Detail24 in
Height - Meters0.58
Height - Meters0.61
Height - Inches23
Height - Inches24
Height [transom]22 in. (0.6 m)
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Meters5.59
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet18
Length - Feet17
Length - Inches4
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 4 in. (5.59 m)
Length overall - Detail17 ft
Length overall - Meters5.59
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Inches22
Length overall - Inches204
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessBottom/sides: .102 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail35 gal. (132 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters132.49
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal35
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Engine max150 hp (111 kw)
Engine max50 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum people4
Maximum people4
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity1,300 lbs

Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 vs Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 or the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013?
The Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 or the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013?
For trailering, the Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 has the edge at 13 lbs dry weight versus 575 lbs for the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 12 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 measures 92" wide, compared to 83" for the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 and Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft Invader 185 2005 and the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.