Matching a deep vee Alumacraft Fisherman 160 2013 against a modified vee Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Fisherman 160 2013 at 16,3 ft versus Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 at 14,3 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 tips the scales at 235 lbs — 229 lbs less than the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 2013 at 6 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 25 hp for the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 2013 and 20 hp for the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Fisherman 160 2013 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The Alumacraft Fisherman 160 2013 at 16,3 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 at 14,3 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.