Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW  Tunnel  FF 2005 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005
2005
View full specs →

Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 vs Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 vs Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 at 16,3 ft versus Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005 at 18,0 ft. At 6 lbs and 94 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005 tops out at 115 hp. Engine specs for the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 18,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelFisherman 160 Tiller
ModelV-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF
Model Year201
Model Year2005
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam73 in. (1.85 m)
Beam86 in
Beam - Meters1.85
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Inches73
Beam - Inches86
Depth - DetailMaximum: 32 in (0.82 m) To Floor: 20 in. (0.51 m)
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches2
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail600 lbs. (272 kg)
Weight - Detail940 lbs
Weight - kg272.16
Weight - kg426.38
Weight - lbs.6
Weight - lbs.94
Width [transom] - Detail67 in (1.7 m)
Width [transom] - Detail60 in
Height [transom]20 in. (0.51 m)
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Meters4.95
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet16.25
Length - Feet18
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Detail25 in
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Meters0.64
Height - Inchesnot available
Height - Inches25
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Inches216
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessBottom: 0.080 in. (2 mm) Sides: 0.065 in. (1.7 mm)
Hull thicknessBottom/sides: 0.102 in
Hull typeOther
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standard25 hp (18 kW)
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - DetailTwo 7.5 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters30.28
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal7.5
Engine maxnot available
Engine max115 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,118 lbs. (507 kg)
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people5
Maximum people6

Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 vs Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 or the Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005?
The Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 comes in at 16,3 feet, making it roughly 1,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 or the Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005?
For trailering, the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 has the edge at 6 lbs dry weight versus 94 lbs for the Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005 has a documented max rating of 115 hp. Engine specifications for the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005 measures 86" wide, compared to 73" for the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 and Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2010 and the Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel FF 2005 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.