Matching a deep vee Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013 against a flat Alumacraft PF 175 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013 at 16,3 ft versus Alumacraft PF 175 2011 at 17,4 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013 tips the scales at 622 lbs — 517 lbs more than the Alumacraft PF 175 2011 at 105 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Alumacraft PF 175 2011 has a 50-hp advantage over the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013's 40-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft PF 175 2011 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft PF 175 2011 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 16 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.