Matching a deep vee Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013 against a modified vee Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013 at 16,3 ft versus Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 at 17,0 ft. At 622 lbs and 575 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 40 hp for the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013 and 50 hp for the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 comes in at 12 lbs per hp versus 16 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 16,3 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Alumacraft MV 1756 AW 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.