Matching a deep vee Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2010 against a modified vee Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2006 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2010 at 16,3 ft versus Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2006 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2006 tips the scales at 875 lbs — 253 lbs less than the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2010 at 622 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2006 tops out at 90 hp. Engine specs for the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2010 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2006 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2010 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2006 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Alumacraft V-Bow 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 18,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.