Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft T14V 2005 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft T14V 2005
2005
View full specs →

Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 vs Alumacraft T14V 2005 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 vs Alumacraft T14V 2005 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 at 14,8 ft versus Alumacraft T14V 2005 at 14,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 tips the scales at 602 lbs — 584 lbs more than the Alumacraft T14V 2005 at 18 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 30 hp for the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 and 15 hp for the Alumacraft T14V 2005. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft T14V 2005 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 20 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 and Alumacraft T14V 2005 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelFisherman 145 CS
ModelT14V
Model Year2011
Model Year2005
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam73 in. (1.85 m)
Beam61 in. (1.55 m)
Beam - Meters1.85
Beam - Meters1.55
Beam - Inches73
Beam - Inches61
Weight - Detail602 lbs. (273 kg)
Weight - Detail180 lbs. (81 kg)
Weight - kg273.06
Weight - kg81.65
Weight - lbs.602
Weight - lbs.18
Width [transom] - Detail67 in. (1.7 m)
Width [transom] - Detail60 in. (1.52 m)
Height - Detail32 in. (0.84 m) To Floor: 20 in. (0.55 m)
Height - Detail26 in. (0.66 m)
Height - Meters0.81
Height - Meters0.66
Height - Inches32
Height - Inches26
Height [transom]20 in. (0.55 m)
Height [transom]16 in. (0.41 m)
Length - Feet14.83
Length - Feet14
Length overall - Detail14 ft. 10 in. (4.5 m)
Length overall - Detail14 ft. 1 in. (4.29 m)
Length overall - Meters4.52
Length overall - Meters4.29
Length overall - Inches178
Length overall - Inches169
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters4.29
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches1
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull thicknessBottom: 0.070 in. (1.78 mm) Sides: 0.065 in. (1.65 mm)
Hull thicknessBottom: 0.060 in. (1.5 mm) Sides: 0.050 in. (1.3 mm)
Hull typeFlat
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Engine max30 hp (19 kW)
Engine max15 hp (11 kw)
Operational Info
StorageSide Livewell: 13 gal. (49 l)
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity925 lbs. (420 kg)
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people4
Maximum people4

Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 vs Alumacraft T14V 2005 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 or the Alumacraft T14V 2005?
The Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 is the longer of the two at 14,8 feet overall. The Alumacraft T14V 2005 comes in at 14,0 feet, making it roughly 0,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 or the Alumacraft T14V 2005?
For trailering, the Alumacraft T14V 2005 has the edge at 18 lbs dry weight versus 602 lbs for the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 is rated to a maximum of 30 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft T14V 2005 tops out at 15 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Alumacraft T14V 2005 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft T14V 2005 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 20 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 measures 73" wide, compared to 61" for the Alumacraft T14V 2005. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 and Alumacraft T14V 2005 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 and the Alumacraft T14V 2005 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.