Matching a flat Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 against a modified vee Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 at 14,8 ft versus Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2013 at 17,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2013 tips the scales at 895 lbs — 293 lbs less than the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 at 602 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2013 has a 45-hp advantage over the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011's 30-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2013 comes in at 12 lbs per hp versus 20 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The Alumacraft MV 1756 AW SC 2013 at 17,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2011 at 14,8 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.