Matching a other Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2009 against a modified vee Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2013 measures 18,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 4,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2009 at 14,0 feet (2009). At 602 lbs and 625 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 35 hp for the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2009 and 50 hp for the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2013 comes in at 13 lbs per hp versus 17 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The Alumacraft MV 1860 AW 2013 at 18,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Alumacraft Fisherman 145 CS 2009 at 14,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.