Matching a deep vee Alumacraft Dominator 165 CS 2010 against a modified vee Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Dominator 165 CS 2010 at 16,7 ft versus Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2009 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Dominator 165 CS 2010 tips the scales at 1 175 lbs — 650 lbs more than the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2009 at 525 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Alumacraft Dominator 165 CS 2010 has a 50-hp advantage over the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2009's 40-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2009 comes in at 13 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Dominator 165 CS 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Alumacraft Dominator 165 CS 2010 and its 90-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2009 with its 40-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.