Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004
2004
View full specs →

Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 vs Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 vs Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 140 hp, the Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004 has a 50-hp advantage over the Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 carries 19 gallons versus 4 gallons in the Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 16,6 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelCompetitor 165 Sport
ModelNavigator 175 CS
Model Year2012
Model Year2004
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam87 in. (2.2 m)
Beam93 in
Beam - Meters2.21
Beam - Meters2.36
Beam - Inches87
Beam - Inches93
Depth - Detail35 in. (0.89 m) To Floor: 23 in. (0.58 m)
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters88.9
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches35
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail1,040 lbs. (471 kg)
Weight - Detail1245 lbs
Weight - kg471.74
Weight - kg564.72
Weight - lbs.104
Weight - lbs.1245
Width [transom] - Detail87 in. (2.2 m)
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]20 in. (0.5 m)
Height [transom]20 in. Width: 93 in
Length - Feet16.58
Length - Feetnot available
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 7 in. (5 m)
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Meters5.05
Length overall - Meters5.26
Length overall - Inches199
Length overall - Inches207
Draft [drive up] - Detailnot available
Draft [drive up] - Detailn/a
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Detail37 in
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Meters0.94
Height - Inchesnot available
Height - Inches37
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessBottom and Sides: 0.080 in. (2 mm)
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal. (71 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel tank capacity - Gal4
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Engine max90 hp (67 kW)
Engine max140 hp
Operational Info
StorageAft Livewell: 19 gal. (71 l)
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity1,325 lbs. (601 kg)
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people6
Maximum people5 persons
Water capacitynot available
Water capacityn/a
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Detailn/a

Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 vs Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 or the Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004?
For trailering, the Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 has the edge at 104 lbs dry weight versus 1 245 lbs for the Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004 is rated to a maximum of 140 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004 measures 93" wide, compared to 87" for the Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 or the Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004?
The Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 has the bigger tank at 19 gallons, versus 4 gallons on the Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004. That 15-gallon difference translates to roughly 45–75 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 and Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft Competitor 165 Sport 2012 and the Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2004 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.