Matching a deep vee Alumacraft Competitor 165 CS 2013 against a flat Alumacraft Pro 175 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Competitor 165 CS 2013 at 16,6 ft versus Alumacraft Pro 175 2012 at 17,4 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Pro 175 2012 tips the scales at 1 075 lbs — 979 lbs less than the Alumacraft Competitor 165 CS 2013 at 96 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 90 hp for the Alumacraft Competitor 165 CS 2013 and 90 hp for the Alumacraft Pro 175 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Alumacraft Pro 175 2012 carries 21 gallons versus 17 gallons in the Alumacraft Competitor 165 CS 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft Competitor 165 CS 2013 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Alumacraft Pro 175 2012 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft Competitor 165 CS 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Competitor 165 CS 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Pro 175 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.