Matching a deep vee Alumacraft Classic 165 Tiller 2012 against a flat Alumacraft Riveted Jon 1648 (15 & 20) 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Classic 165 Tiller 2012 at 16,3 ft versus Alumacraft Riveted Jon 1648 (15 & 20) 2011 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Classic 165 Tiller 2012 tips the scales at 805 lbs — 520 lbs more than the Alumacraft Riveted Jon 1648 (15 & 20) 2011 at 285 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 60 hp, the Alumacraft Classic 165 Tiller 2012 has a 30-hp advantage over the Alumacraft Riveted Jon 1648 (15 & 20) 2011's 30-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Riveted Jon 1648 (15 & 20) 2011 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Classic 165 Tiller 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Alumacraft Classic 165 Tiller 2012 and its 60-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Alumacraft Riveted Jon 1648 (15 & 20) 2011 with its 30-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.