Matching a deep vee Alumacraft Classic 165 CS 2013 against a modified vee Alumacraft MV 1650 AW CC 2007 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Classic 165 CS 2013 at 16,3 ft versus Alumacraft MV 1650 AW CC 2007 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Classic 165 CS 2013 tips the scales at 895 lbs — 826 lbs more than the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW CC 2007 at 69 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 75 hp for the Alumacraft Classic 165 CS 2013 and 60 hp for the Alumacraft MV 1650 AW CC 2007. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft MV 1650 AW CC 2007 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Classic 165 CS 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.