When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Alumacraft Classic 165 CS 2007 and the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW RR 2006 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Classic 165 CS 2007 at 16,0 ft versus Alumacraft MV 1756 AW RR 2006 at 17,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Classic 165 CS 2007 tips the scales at 912 lbs — 826 lbs more than the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW RR 2006 at 86 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW RR 2006 has a 40-hp advantage over the Alumacraft Classic 165 CS 2007's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 22 gal and 25 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft MV 1756 AW RR 2006 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Classic 165 CS 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.