Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006
2006
View full specs →

Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 vs Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a tunnel Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 against a modified vee Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 measures 17,0 feet overall (2006), giving it roughly 15,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 at 2,0 feet (2012). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 tips the scales at 1 415 lbs — 1 403 lbs less than the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 at 12 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 has a 45-hp advantage over the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012's 130-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 carries 34 gallons versus 21 gallons in the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 8 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelAll-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF
ModelTournament Pro 175 CS
Model Year2012
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam94 in
Beam96 in. (2.43 m)
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches94
Beam - Inches96
Weight - Detail1,200 lbs
Weight - Detail1,415 lbs. (641 kg)
Weight - kg544.31
Weight - kg641.83
Weight - lbs.12
Weight - lbs.1415
Height - Detail27 in
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters0.69
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches27
Height - Inchesnot available
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]25 in. (.51 m)
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet17
Length overall - Detail20 ft
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 11 in. (5.46 m)
Length overall - Meters6.1
Length overall - Meters5.46
Length overall - Inches24
Length overall - Inches215
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - DetailMaximum: 41.5 in. (1.1 m) To Floor: 22 in. (.56 m)
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters106.68
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches41.5
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail95 in. (2.41 m)
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters5.46
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches11
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull thicknessBottom: .100 in. (2.5 mm) Sides: .080 in. (2.0 mm) 2XB Bow?2nd Plate: .100 in. 2XB Bottom?2nd Plate: .080 in
Hull typeTunnel
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail21 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail34 gal. with reserve (129 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters79.49
Fuel tank capacity - Liters128.7
Fuel tank capacity - Gal21
Fuel tank capacity - Gal34
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max130 hp
Engine max175 hp (130 kw)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,100 lbs
Maximum capacity1,550 lbs. (703 kg)
Maximum people8
Maximum people5

Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 vs Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 or the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006?
The Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 15,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 or the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006?
For trailering, the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 has the edge at 12 lbs dry weight versus 1 415 lbs for the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 is rated to a maximum of 175 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 tops out at 130 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 8 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 measures 96" wide, compared to 94" for the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 or the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006?
The Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 has the bigger tank at 34 gallons, versus 21 gallons on the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012. That 13-gallon difference translates to roughly 39–65 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 and Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 2072 AW Tunnel FF 2012 and the Alumacraft Tournament Pro 175 CS 2006 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.