Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007
2007
View full specs →

Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 vs Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 and the Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 at 18,0 ft versus Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007 at 19,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007 tips the scales at 1 735 lbs — 1 667 lbs less than the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 at 68 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007 has a 150-hp advantage over the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007 and its 200-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 with its 50-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelAll-Weld MV 1860 AW
ModelTournament Sport 195
Model Year2012
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam86 in
Beam97 in. (2.46 m)
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Meters2.46
Beam - Inches86
Beam - Inches97
Weight - Detail680 lbs
Weight - Detail1,735 lbs. (787 kg)
Weight - kg308.44
Weight - kg786.98
Weight - lbs.68
Weight - lbs.1735
Height - Detail25 in
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters0.64
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches25
Height - Inchesnot available
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]25 in. (0.63 m)
Length - Feet18
Length - Feet19
Length overall - Detail18 ft
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 3 in. (5.86 m)
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Meters5.87
Length overall - Inches216
Length overall - Inches231
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - DetailMaximum: 43 in. (1.1 m) To Floor: 22 in. (0.56 m)
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters109.22
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches43
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail96 in. (2.4 m)
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters5.86
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches3
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull thicknessBottom: 0.100 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max50 hp
Engine max200 hp (148 kW)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 gal. (151 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal4
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,600 lbs
Maximum capacity1,850 lbs. (839 kg)
Maximum people6
Maximum people6

Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 vs Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 or the Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007?
The Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 comes in at 18,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 or the Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007?
For trailering, the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 has the edge at 68 lbs dry weight versus 1 735 lbs for the Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007 is rated to a maximum of 200 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007 measures 97" wide, compared to 86" for the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 and Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 and the Alumacraft Tournament Sport 195 2007 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.