Matching a modified vee Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW SC 2012 against a deep vee Alumacraft Navigator 165 Tiller 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW SC 2012 at 18,0 ft versus Alumacraft Navigator 165 Tiller 2012 at 16,7 ft. At 875 lbs and 925 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 90 hp for the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW SC 2012 and 75 hp for the Alumacraft Navigator 165 Tiller 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 21 gal and 19 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW SC 2012 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Navigator 165 Tiller 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW SC 2012 and Alumacraft Navigator 165 Tiller 2012 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.