When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2012 and the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2006 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2012 at 18,0 ft versus Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2006 at 18,0 ft. At 905 lbs and 875 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2012 has a 25-hp advantage over the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2006's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2012 comes in at 8 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2012 and its 115-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2006 with its 90-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.