Matching a modified vee Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2012 against a deep vee Alumacraft Fisherman 145 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2012 measures 18,0 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 3,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 2013 at 14,8 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2012 tips the scales at 905 lbs — 847 lbs more than the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 2013 at 58 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2012 has a 90-hp advantage over the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 2013's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2012 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Alumacraft Fisherman 145 2013 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2012 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Fisherman 145 2013 comes in at 2 lbs per hp versus 8 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.