Matching a modified vee Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2011 against a tunnel Alumacraft All-Weld VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2011 at 18,0 ft versus Alumacraft All-Weld VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2011 at 18,0 ft. At 905 lbs and 875 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2011 has a 25-hp advantage over the Alumacraft All-Weld VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2011's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 21 gal and 21 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW CC 2011 comes in at 8 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft All-Weld VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.