Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft Waterfowler 16  2006 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006
2006
View full specs →

Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 vs Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 and the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 at 17,0 ft versus Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006 tips the scales at 525 lbs — 519 lbs less than the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 at 6 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 50 hp for the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 and 40 hp for the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 and Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelAll-Weld MV 1756
ModelWaterfowler 16
Model Year2011
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam83 in
Beam74 in
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Meters1.88
Beam - Inches83
Beam - Inches74
Weight - Detail600 lbs
Weight - Detail525 lbs
Weight - kg272.16
Weight - kg238.14
Weight - lbs.6
Weight - lbs.525
Height - Detail24 in
Height - Detail22 in
Height - Meters0.61
Height - Meters0.56
Height - Inches24
Height - Inches22
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches204
Length overall - Inches192
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail50 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull thickness.102 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max50 hp
Engine max40 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,300 lbs
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs
Maximum people5
Maximum people5

Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 vs Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 or the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 or the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006?
For trailering, the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 has the edge at 6 lbs dry weight versus 525 lbs for the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 is rated to a maximum of 50 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006 tops out at 40 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 13 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 measures 83" wide, compared to 74" for the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 and Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 and the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2006 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.