Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012
2012
View full specs →

Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 vs Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 against a flat Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 at 17,0 ft versus Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012 at 14,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012 tips the scales at 135 lbs — 129 lbs less than the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 at 6 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 50 hp, the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 has a 35-hp advantage over the Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012's 15-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012 caps at 3. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 9 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 17,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 3 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelAll-Weld MV 1756
ModelSierra 1436 LT
Model Year2011
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam83 in
Beam55 in
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Meters1.4
Beam - Inches83
Beam - Inches55
Weight - Detail600 lbs
Weight - Detail135 lbs
Weight - kg272.16
Weight - kg61.23
Weight - lbs.6
Weight - lbs.135
Height - Detail24 in
Height - DetailSide: 19 in
Height - Meters0.61
Height - Meters0.48
Height - Inches24
Height - Inches19
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]15 in
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet14
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail14 ft
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Meters4.27
Length overall - Inches204
Length overall - Inches168
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull thickness0.053 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeFlat
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max50 hp
Engine maxnot available
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower15 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,300 lbs
Maximum capacity625 lbs
Maximum people5
Maximum people3

Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 vs Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 or the Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012 comes in at 14,0 feet, making it roughly 3,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 or the Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012?
For trailering, the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 has the edge at 6 lbs dry weight versus 135 lbs for the Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 is rated to a maximum of 50 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012 tops out at 15 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012 is certified for 3. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 9 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 measures 83" wide, compared to 55" for the Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 and Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 and the Alumacraft Sierra 1436 LT 2012 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.