Matching a modified vee Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 against a deep vee Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 at 17,0 ft versus Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013 at 16,3 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013 tips the scales at 622 lbs — 616 lbs less than the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 at 6 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 50 hp for the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 and 40 hp for the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 2011 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 16 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 CS 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.