Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012
2012
View full specs →

Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012 vs Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012 and the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012 at 17,0 ft versus Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 at 18,0 ft. At 86 lbs and 68 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 50 hp for the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012 and 50 hp for the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 2 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 18,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelAll-Weld MV 1756 CC
ModelAll-Weld MV 1860 AW
Model Year2012
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam83 in
Beam86 in
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Inches83
Beam - Inches86
Weight - Detail860 lbs
Weight - Detail680 lbs
Weight - kg390.09
Weight - kg308.44
Weight - lbs.86
Weight - lbs.68
Height - Detail24 in
Height - Detail25 in
Height - Meters0.61
Height - Meters0.64
Height - Inches24
Height - Inches25
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet18
Length overall - Detail17 ft
Length overall - Detail18 ft
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inches204
Length overall - Inches216
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail21 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters79.49
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal21
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max50 hp
Engine max50 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,300 lbs
Maximum capacity1,600 lbs
Maximum people5
Maximum people6

Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012 vs Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012 or the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012 or the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012?
For trailering, the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 has the edge at 68 lbs dry weight versus 86 lbs for the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 2 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 measures 86" wide, compared to 83" for the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012 and Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1756 CC 2012 and the Alumacraft All-Weld MV 1860 AW 2012 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.