Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft T12V 2010 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft T12V 2010
2010
View full specs →

Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 vs Alumacraft T12V 2010 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a tunnel Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 against a other Alumacraft T12V 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 measures 16,0 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 3,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Alumacraft T12V 2010 at 12,2 feet (2010). At 69 lbs and 16 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 60 hp, the Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 has a 50-hp advantage over the Alumacraft T12V 2010's 10-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft T12V 2010 caps at 3. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 2 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft T12V 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Alumacraft T12V 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 3 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelAll Weld MV 1650 CC
ModelT12V
Model Year2012
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam74 in
Beam60 in. (1.52 m)
Beam - Meters1.88
Beam - Meters1.52
Beam - Inches74
Beam - Inches6
Weight - Detail690 lbs
Weight - Detail160 lbs. (73 kg)
Weight - kg312.98
Weight - kg72.57
Weight - lbs.69
Weight - lbs.16
Height - Detail22 in
Height - Detail25 in. (0.64 m)
Height - Meters0.56
Height - Meters0.64
Height - Inches22
Height - Inches25
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]15 in. (0.38 m)
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet12.17
Length overall - Detail16 ft
Length overall - Detail12 ft. 2 in. (3.7 m)
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters3.71
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches146
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail60 in. (1.52 m)
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters3.7
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull thicknessBottom: 0.060 in. (1.52 mm) Sides: 0.050 in. (1.27 mm)
Hull typeTunnel
Hull typeOther
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max60 hp
Engine max10 hp (7 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs
Maximum capacity655 lbs. (297 kg)
Maximum people5
Maximum people3

Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 vs Alumacraft T12V 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 or the Alumacraft T12V 2010?
The Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft T12V 2010 comes in at 12,2 feet, making it roughly 3,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 or the Alumacraft T12V 2010?
For trailering, the Alumacraft T12V 2010 has the edge at 16 lbs dry weight versus 69 lbs for the Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 is rated to a maximum of 60 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft T12V 2010 tops out at 10 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft T12V 2010 is certified for 3. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 2 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft T12V 2010. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 measures 74" wide, compared to 6" for the Alumacraft T12V 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 and Alumacraft T12V 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft All Weld MV 1650 CC 2012 and the Alumacraft T12V 2010 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.