Alumacraft 1648 2007 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft 1648 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011
2011
View full specs →

Alumacraft 1648 2007 vs Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 — A Close Look at Two Flats

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Alumacraft 1648 2007 and the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 are flat designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft 1648 2007 at 16,0 ft versus Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 at 16,3 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft 1648 2007 tips the scales at 285 lbs — 279 lbs more than the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 at 6 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 35 hp for the Alumacraft 1648 2007 and 25 hp for the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 8 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft 1648 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Alumacraft 1648 2007 and Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
Model1648
ModelFisherman 160 Tiller
Model Year2007
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam70 in
Beam73 in. (1.85 m)
Beam - Meters1.78
Beam - Meters1.85
Beam - Inches7
Beam - Inches73
Weight - Detail285 lbs
Weight - Detail600 lbs. (272 kg)
Weight - kg129.27
Weight - kg272.16
Weight - lbs.285
Weight - lbs.6
Width [transom] - Detail48 in
Width [transom] - Detail67 in. (1.7 m)
Height - Detail21 in
Height - Detail32 in. (0.84 m) To Floor: 20 in. (0.55 m)
Height - Meters0.53
Height - Meters0.81
Height - Inches21
Height - Inches32
Height [transom]15 or 20 in
Height [transom]20 in. (0.55 m)
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet16.25
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 3 in. (4.9 m)
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters4.95
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches195
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.070 in
Hull thicknessBottom: 0.070 in. (1.78 mm) Sides: 0.065 in. (1.65 mm)
Hull typeFlat
Hull typeFlat
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max35 hp
Engine max25 hp (19 kW)
Operational Info
StorageCenter bench seat storage
StorageSide Livewell: 13 gal. (49 l)
Maximum capacity1,010 lbs
Maximum capacity1,118 lbs. (507 kg)
Maximum people5
Maximum people5

Alumacraft 1648 2007 vs Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft 1648 2007 or the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011?
The Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 is the longer of the two at 16,3 feet overall. The Alumacraft 1648 2007 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 0,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft 1648 2007 or the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011?
For trailering, the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 has the edge at 6 lbs dry weight versus 285 lbs for the Alumacraft 1648 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft 1648 2007 is rated to a maximum of 35 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft 1648 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 8 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft 1648 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 measures 73" wide, compared to 7" for the Alumacraft 1648 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft 1648 2007 and Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft 1648 2007 and the Alumacraft Fisherman 160 Tiller 2011 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.