Alumacraft 1542  2007 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft 1542 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft MV 1860 AW  SC 2007 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007
2007
View full specs →

Alumacraft 1542 2007 vs Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a flat Alumacraft 1542 2007 against a modified vee Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft 1542 2007 at 15,0 ft versus Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 tips the scales at 875 lbs — 854 lbs less than the Alumacraft 1542 2007 at 21 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 has a 65-hp advantage over the Alumacraft 1542 2007's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Alumacraft 1542 2007 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft 1542 2007 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 18,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Alumacraft 1542 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
Model1542
ModelMV 1860 AW SC
Model Year2007
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam62 in
Beam86 in
Beam - Meters1.57
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Inches62
Beam - Inches86
Weight - Detail210 lbs
Weight - Detail875 lbs
Weight - kg95.25
Weight - kg396.89
Weight - lbs.21
Weight - lbs.875
Width [transom] - Detail42 in
Width [transom] - Detail60 in
Height - Detail20 in
Height - Detail25 in
Height - Meters0.51
Height - Meters0.64
Height - Inches2
Height - Inches25
Height [transom]15 in
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Feet15
Length - Feet18
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters4.57
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inches18
Length overall - Inches216
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.063 in
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull typeFlat
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max25 hp
Engine max90 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail16 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters60.57
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal16
Operational Info
Maximum capacity775 lbs
Maximum capacity1,265 lbs
Maximum people4
Maximum people6

Alumacraft 1542 2007 vs Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft 1542 2007 or the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007?
The Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft 1542 2007 comes in at 15,0 feet, making it roughly 3,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft 1542 2007 or the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007?
For trailering, the Alumacraft 1542 2007 has the edge at 21 lbs dry weight versus 875 lbs for the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 is rated to a maximum of 90 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft 1542 2007 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft 1542 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft 1542 2007 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 10 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 measures 86" wide, compared to 62" for the Alumacraft 1542 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft 1542 2007 and Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft 1542 2007 and the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC 2007 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.