Alumacraft 1448 2013 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft 1448 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft Yukon 165 2002 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft Yukon 165 2002
2002
View full specs →

Alumacraft 1448 2013 vs Alumacraft Yukon 165 2002 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Alumacraft 1448 2013 vs Alumacraft Yukon 165 2002 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 50 hp, the Alumacraft Yukon 165 2002 has a 25-hp advantage over the Alumacraft 1448 2013's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Alumacraft Yukon 165 2002 and its 50-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Alumacraft 1448 2013 with its 25-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
Model1448
ModelYukon 165
Model Year2013
Model Year2002
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam70 in
Beam76 in
Beam - Meters1.78
Beam - Meters1.93
Beam - Inches7
Beam - Inches76
Weight - Detail385 lbs
Weight - Detail715 lbs
Weight - kg174.63
Weight - kg324.32
Weight - lbs.385
Weight - lbs.715
Width [transom] - Detail48 in. bottom width
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height - Detail21 in
Height - Detail37 in
Height - Meters0.53
Height - Meters0.94
Height - Inches21
Height - Inches37
Height [transom]15 / 20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet14
Length - Feetnot available
Length overall - Detail14 ft
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters4.27
Length overall - Meters5.03
Length overall - Inches168
Length overall - Inches198
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.070 in
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull typeFlat
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Engine max25 hp
Engine max50 HP
Operational Info
Maximum capacity885 lbs
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people5
Maximum people5 persons

Alumacraft 1448 2013 vs Alumacraft Yukon 165 2002 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft 1448 2013 or the Alumacraft Yukon 165 2002?
For trailering, the Alumacraft 1448 2013 has the edge at 385 lbs dry weight versus 715 lbs for the Alumacraft Yukon 165 2002. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft Yukon 165 2002 is rated to a maximum of 50 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft 1448 2013 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft 1448 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft Yukon 165 2002 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft Yukon 165 2002 measures 76" wide, compared to 7" for the Alumacraft 1448 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft 1448 2013 and Alumacraft Yukon 165 2002 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft 1448 2013 and the Alumacraft Yukon 165 2002 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.