Matching a flat Alumacraft 1442 2006 against a tunnel Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Alumacraft 1442 2006 measures 14,0 feet overall (2006), giving it roughly 12,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2013 at 2,0 feet (2013). At 19 lbs and 74 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2013 has a 65-hp advantage over the Alumacraft 1442 2006's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft 1442 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The Alumacraft 1442 2006 at 14,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2013 at 2,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.