Alumacraft 1036 2013 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft 1036 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008
2008
View full specs →

Alumacraft 1036 2013 vs Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 — Which Flat Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Alumacraft 1036 2013 and the Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 are flat designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 measures 14,0 feet overall (2008), giving it roughly 13,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Alumacraft 1036 2013 at 1,0 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 tips the scales at 135 lbs — 134 lbs less than the Alumacraft 1036 2013 at 1 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 3 hp for the Alumacraft 1036 2013 and 15 hp for the Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 is rated for 3 passengers, while the Alumacraft 1036 2013 caps at 2. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft 1036 2013 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 9 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 3 passengers and at 14,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Alumacraft 1036 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 2 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
Model1036
Model1436 Lite
Model Year2013
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam55 in
Beam55 in
Beam - Meters1.4
Beam - Meters1.4
Beam - Inches55
Beam - Inches55
Weight - Detail100 lbs
Weight - Detail135 lbs
Weight - kg45.36
Weight - kg61.23
Weight - lbs.1
Weight - lbs.135
Width [transom] - Detail36 in. bottom width
Width [transom] - Detail36 in
Height - Detail19 in
Height - Detail19 in
Height - Meters0.48
Height - Meters0.48
Height - Inches19
Height - Inches19
Height [transom]15 in
Height [transom]15 in
Length - Feet1
Length - Feet14
Length overall - Detail10 ft
Length overall - Detail14 ft
Length overall - Meters3.05
Length overall - Meters4.27
Length overall - Inches12
Length overall - Inches168
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.053 in
Hull thickness0.053 in
Hull typeFlat
Hull typeFlat
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max3 hp
Engine max15 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity365 lbs
Maximum capacity625 lbs
Maximum people2
Maximum people3

Alumacraft 1036 2013 vs Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft 1036 2013 or the Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008?
The Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 is the longer of the two at 14,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft 1036 2013 comes in at 1,0 feet, making it roughly 13,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft 1036 2013 or the Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008?
For trailering, the Alumacraft 1036 2013 has the edge at 1 lbs dry weight versus 135 lbs for the Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 is rated to a maximum of 15 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft 1036 2013 tops out at 3 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft 1036 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 2 passengers, while the Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 is certified for 3. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft 1036 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 9 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Alumacraft 1036 2013 and Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 share an 55 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Are the Alumacraft 1036 2013 and Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft 1036 2013 and the Alumacraft 1436 Lite 2008 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.