Achilles LSR-310 2012 boat specs
Achilles
Achilles LSR-310 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Achilles SU-16 2008 boat specs
Achilles
Achilles SU-16 2008
2008
View full specs →

Achilles LSR-310 2012 vs Achilles SU-16 2008 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a inflatable non rigid Achilles LSR-310 2012 against a inflatable rigid Achilles SU-16 2008 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Achilles SU-16 2008 measures 16,0 feet overall (2008), giving it roughly 5,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Achilles LSR-310 2012 at 10,2 feet (2012). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Achilles SU-16 2008 tips the scales at 378 lbs — 277 lbs less than the Achilles LSR-310 2012 at 101 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Achilles SU-16 2008 has a 65-hp advantage over the Achilles LSR-310 2012's 10-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Achilles SU-16 2008 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Achilles LSR-310 2012 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Achilles SU-16 2008 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Achilles SU-16 2008 comes in at 5 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the Achilles LSR-310 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

The Achilles LSR-310 2012 is an inflatable design — lighter, easier to store, and quicker to launch from a beach or dock without a slipway. The Achilles SU-16 2008 is a rigid hull, which typically offers a more confident ride in chop and easier maintenance over the long term.

Bottom line: Choose the Achilles SU-16 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Achilles LSR-310 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAchilles
MakeAchilles
ModelLSR-31
ModelSU-16
Model Year2012
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam5 ft. 2 in. (158 cm) 2 ft. 4 in. (72 cm) inside
Beam6 ft. 9 in. (206 cm)
Beam - Meters1.57
Beam - Meters2.06
Beam - Inches62
Beam - Inches81
Weight - Detail101 lbs. (46 kg)
Weight - Detail378 lbs. (171.5 kg)
Weight - kg45.81
Weight - kg171.46
Weight - lbs.101
Weight - lbs.378
Length [deck]7 ft. 3 in. (220 cm) inside
Length [deck]not available
Length - Feet10.17
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail10 ft. 2 in. (310 cm)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in. (488 cm)
Length overall - Meters3.1
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches122
Length overall - Inches192
Body / Hull
Hull materialInflatable
Hull materialInflatable
Hull typeInflatable Non Rigid
Hull typeInflatable Rigid
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter17 in. (43 cm)
Tube diameter21 in. (53 cm)
Number of tubes2 air chambers and keel
Number of tubesnot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max10 hp
Engine max75 hp (long)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,300 lbs. (590 kg)
Maximum capacity3,220 lbs. (1,460 kg)
Maximum people4
Maximum people9

Achilles LSR-310 2012 vs Achilles SU-16 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Achilles LSR-310 2012 or the Achilles SU-16 2008?
The Achilles SU-16 2008 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Achilles LSR-310 2012 comes in at 10,2 feet, making it roughly 5,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Achilles LSR-310 2012 or the Achilles SU-16 2008?
For trailering, the Achilles LSR-310 2012 has the edge at 101 lbs dry weight versus 378 lbs for the Achilles SU-16 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Achilles SU-16 2008 is rated to a maximum of 75 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Achilles LSR-310 2012 tops out at 10 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Achilles LSR-310 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Achilles SU-16 2008 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Achilles SU-16 2008 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 5 lbs per hp compared to 10 lbs per hp for the Achilles LSR-310 2012. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Achilles SU-16 2008 measures 81" wide, compared to 62" for the Achilles LSR-310 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Achilles LSR-310 2012 and Achilles SU-16 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Achilles LSR-310 2012 and the Achilles SU-16 2008 are built by Achilles. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.