Achilles LS2-RU 2007 boat specs
Achilles
Achilles LS2-RU 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Achilles SU-16 2013 boat specs
Achilles
Achilles SU-16 2013
2013
View full specs →

Achilles LS2-RU 2007 vs Achilles SU-16 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Achilles LS2-RU 2007 vs Achilles SU-16 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Achilles SU-16 2013 measures 16,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 9,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Achilles LS2-RU 2007 at 7,0 feet (2007). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Achilles SU-16 2013 tips the scales at 371 lbs — 315 lbs less than the Achilles LS2-RU 2007 at 56 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Achilles SU-16 2013 has a 71-hp advantage over the Achilles LS2-RU 2007's 4-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Achilles SU-16 2013 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Achilles LS2-RU 2007 caps at 2. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Achilles SU-16 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Achilles SU-16 2013 comes in at 5 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the Achilles LS2-RU 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

The Achilles SU-16 2013 is an inflatable design — lighter, easier to store, and quicker to launch from a beach or dock without a slipway. The Achilles LS2-RU 2007 is a rigid hull, which typically offers a more confident ride in chop and easier maintenance over the long term.

Bottom line: Choose the Achilles SU-16 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Achilles LS2-RU 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 2 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAchilles
MakeAchilles
ModelLS2-RU
ModelSU-16
Model Year2007
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam4 ft. 4 in. (132 cm)
Beam6 ft. 9 in. (206 cm) 3 ft. 3 in. (100 cm) inside
Beam - Meters1.32
Beam - Meters2.06
Beam - Inches52
Beam - Inches81
Weight - Detail56 lbs. (25.5 kg)
Weight - Detail371 lbs. (168.5 kg)
Weight - kg25.4
Weight - kg168.28
Weight - lbs.56
Weight - lbs.371
Length - Feet7
Length - Feet16
Length - Inches6
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail7 ft. 6 in. (228 cm)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. (488 cm)
Length overall - Meters2.29
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches9
Length overall - Inches192
Length [deck]not available
Length [deck]10 ft. 10 in. (330 cm) inside
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter14 in. (35 cm)
Tube diameter21 in. (53 cm)
Number of tubesnot available
Number of tubes5 air chambers and keel
Engine and Drivetrain
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max4 hp
Engine max75 hp, long
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Operational Info
Maximum capacity594 lbs. (270 kg)
Maximum capacity3,170 lbs. (1,440 kg)
Maximum people2
Maximum people9
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialInflatable
Hull typenot available
Hull typeInflatable Non Rigid

Achilles LS2-RU 2007 vs Achilles SU-16 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Achilles LS2-RU 2007 or the Achilles SU-16 2013?
The Achilles SU-16 2013 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Achilles LS2-RU 2007 comes in at 7,0 feet, making it roughly 9,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Achilles LS2-RU 2007 or the Achilles SU-16 2013?
For trailering, the Achilles LS2-RU 2007 has the edge at 56 lbs dry weight versus 371 lbs for the Achilles SU-16 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Achilles SU-16 2013 is rated to a maximum of 75 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Achilles LS2-RU 2007 tops out at 4 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Achilles LS2-RU 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 2 passengers, while the Achilles SU-16 2013 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Achilles SU-16 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 5 lbs per hp compared to 14 lbs per hp for the Achilles LS2-RU 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Achilles SU-16 2013 measures 81" wide, compared to 52" for the Achilles LS2-RU 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Achilles LS2-RU 2007 and Achilles SU-16 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Achilles LS2-RU 2007 and the Achilles SU-16 2013 are built by Achilles. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.