Achilles FRB-104 2013 boat specs
Achilles
Achilles FRB-104 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Achilles SU-16 2008 boat specs
Achilles
Achilles SU-16 2008
2008
View full specs →

Achilles FRB-104 2013 vs Achilles SU-16 2008 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a inflatable non rigid Achilles FRB-104 2013 against a inflatable rigid Achilles SU-16 2008 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Achilles SU-16 2008 measures 16,0 feet overall (2008), giving it roughly 5,7 additional feet of deck space compared to the Achilles FRB-104 2013 at 10,3 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Achilles SU-16 2008 tips the scales at 378 lbs — 270 lbs less than the Achilles FRB-104 2013 at 108 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Achilles SU-16 2008 has a 60-hp advantage over the Achilles FRB-104 2013's 15-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Achilles SU-16 2008 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Achilles FRB-104 2013 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Achilles SU-16 2008 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Achilles SU-16 2008 comes in at 5 lbs per hp versus 7 lbs per hp for the Achilles FRB-104 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

The Achilles FRB-104 2013 is an inflatable design — lighter, easier to store, and quicker to launch from a beach or dock without a slipway. The Achilles SU-16 2008 is a rigid hull, which typically offers a more confident ride in chop and easier maintenance over the long term.

Bottom line: Choose the Achilles SU-16 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Achilles FRB-104 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAchilles
MakeAchilles
ModelFRB-104
ModelSU-16
Model Year2013
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam5 ft. 2 in. (158 cm) 2 ft. 4 in. (72 cm) inside
Beam6 ft. 9 in. (206 cm)
Beam - Meters1.57
Beam - Meters2.06
Beam - Inches62
Beam - Inches81
Weight - Detail108 lbs. (49 kg)
Weight - Detail378 lbs. (171.5 kg)
Weight - kg48.99
Weight - kg171.46
Weight - lbs.108
Weight - lbs.378
Length [deck]7 ft. 3 in. (220 cm) inside
Length [deck]not available
Length - Feet10.33
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail10 ft. 4 in. (315 cm)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in. (488 cm)
Length overall - Meters3.15
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches124
Length overall - Inches192
Body / Hull
Hull materialInflatable
Hull materialInflatable
Hull typeInflatable Non Rigid
Hull typeInflatable Rigid
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter17 in. (43 cm)
Tube diameter21 in. (53 cm)
Number of tubes2 air chambers and keel
Number of tubesnot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max15 hp
Engine max75 hp (long)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,210 lbs. (550 kg)
Maximum capacity3,220 lbs. (1,460 kg)
Maximum people4
Maximum people9

Achilles FRB-104 2013 vs Achilles SU-16 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Achilles FRB-104 2013 or the Achilles SU-16 2008?
The Achilles SU-16 2008 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Achilles FRB-104 2013 comes in at 10,3 feet, making it roughly 5,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Achilles FRB-104 2013 or the Achilles SU-16 2008?
For trailering, the Achilles FRB-104 2013 has the edge at 108 lbs dry weight versus 378 lbs for the Achilles SU-16 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Achilles SU-16 2008 is rated to a maximum of 75 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Achilles FRB-104 2013 tops out at 15 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Achilles FRB-104 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Achilles SU-16 2008 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Achilles SU-16 2008 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 5 lbs per hp compared to 7 lbs per hp for the Achilles FRB-104 2013. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Achilles SU-16 2008 measures 81" wide, compared to 62" for the Achilles FRB-104 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Achilles FRB-104 2013 and Achilles SU-16 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Achilles FRB-104 2013 and the Achilles SU-16 2008 are built by Achilles. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.