Achilles FRB-104 2010 boat specs
Achilles
Achilles FRB-104 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Achilles LT-2 2013 boat specs
Achilles
Achilles LT-2 2013
2013
View full specs →

Achilles FRB-104 2010 vs Achilles LT-2 2013 — Which Inflatable Non Rigid Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Achilles FRB-104 2010 and the Achilles LT-2 2013 are inflatable non rigid designs with inflatable construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Achilles FRB-104 2010 measures 10,3 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 3,1 additional feet of deck space compared to the Achilles LT-2 2013 at 7,3 feet (2013). At 108 lbs and 37 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 15 hp for the Achilles FRB-104 2010 and 3 hp for the Achilles LT-2 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Achilles FRB-104 2010 is rated for 4 passengers, while the Achilles LT-2 2013 caps at 2. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Achilles FRB-104 2010 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Achilles FRB-104 2010 comes in at 7 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Achilles LT-2 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

The Achilles LT-2 2013 is an inflatable design — lighter, easier to store, and quicker to launch from a beach or dock without a slipway. The Achilles FRB-104 2010 is a rigid hull, which typically offers a more confident ride in chop and easier maintenance over the long term.

Bottom line: Choose the Achilles FRB-104 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 4 passengers and at 10,3 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Achilles LT-2 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 2 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAchilles
MakeAchilles
ModelFRB-104
ModelLT-2
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam2 ft. 4 in. (72 cm) inside
Beam4 ft. 1 in. (124 cm) 1 ft. 11 in. (58 cm) inside
Beam - Meters0.71
Beam - Meters1.24
Beam - Inches28
Beam - Inches49
Weight - Detail108 lbs. (49 kg)
Weight - Detail37 lbs. (16.5 kg)
Weight - kg48.99
Weight - kg16.78
Weight - lbs.108
Weight - lbs.37
Length - Feet10.33
Length - Feet7.25
Length overall - Detail10 ft. 4 in. (315 cm)
Length overall - Detail7 ft. 3 in. (220 cm)
Length overall - Meters3.15
Length overall - Meters2.21
Length overall - Inches124
Length overall - Inches87
Length [deck]not available
Length [deck]5 ft. (153 cm) inside
Body / Hull
Hull materialInflatable
Hull materialInflatable
Hull typeInflatable Non Rigid
Hull typeInflatable Non Rigid
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter17 in. (43 cm)
Tube diameter13 in. (33 cm)
Number of tubesnot available
Number of tubes2 air chambers
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max15 hp
Engine max3 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,230 lbs. (560 kg)
Maximum capacity640 lbs. (290 kg)
Maximum people4
Maximum people2

Achilles FRB-104 2010 vs Achilles LT-2 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Achilles FRB-104 2010 or the Achilles LT-2 2013?
The Achilles FRB-104 2010 is the longer of the two at 10,3 feet overall. The Achilles LT-2 2013 comes in at 7,3 feet, making it roughly 3,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Achilles FRB-104 2010 or the Achilles LT-2 2013?
For trailering, the Achilles LT-2 2013 has the edge at 37 lbs dry weight versus 108 lbs for the Achilles FRB-104 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Achilles FRB-104 2010 is rated to a maximum of 15 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Achilles LT-2 2013 tops out at 3 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Achilles FRB-104 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Achilles LT-2 2013 is certified for 2. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Achilles FRB-104 2010 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 7 lbs per hp compared to 12 lbs per hp for the Achilles LT-2 2013. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Achilles LT-2 2013 measures 49" wide, compared to 28" for the Achilles FRB-104 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Achilles FRB-104 2010 and Achilles LT-2 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Achilles FRB-104 2010 and the Achilles LT-2 2013 are built by Achilles. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.