Name: Caravelle 209 2000
Brand: Caravelle

Caravelle

Caravelle 209 2000

Compare 2000

General Boat Info

Make Caravelle

Model 209

Model Year 2

Measurements / Dimensions

Beam 8' 6"

Beam - Meters 2.44

Beam - Inches 96

Deadrise 18 degree

Weight - Detail 2900 lbs

Weight - kg 1315.42

Weight - lbs. 29

Length overall - Detail 20' 6"

Length overall - Meters 6.1

Length overall - Inches 24

Body / Hull

Hull material Fiberglass

Engine and Drivetrain

Engine/s standard 300 Max

Fuel tank capacity - Detail 36 gal

Fuel tank capacity - Liters 136.27

Fuel tank capacity - Gal 36

Operational Info

Maximum people 10 persons

Trailer Info

Trailer - Detail Optional

More Caravelle specs

Other boats from the same manufacturer you might be interested in.

Caravelle 187LS Fish & Ski 2007

Caravelle / 187LS Fish & Ski / 2007

View spec sheet →

Caravelle 209 Cuddy Cabin 2001

Caravelle / 209 Cuddy Cabin / 2001

View spec sheet →

Caravelle 209 Bowrider 2001

Caravelle / 209 Bowrider / 2001

View spec sheet →

Caravelle 217LS Bowrider 2009

Caravelle / 217LS Bowrider / 2009

View spec sheet →

Caravelle 192 SS Bowrider 2007

Caravelle / 192 SS Bowrider / 2007

View spec sheet →

Caravelle 232 SS Sport Cabin 2009

Caravelle / 232 SS Sport Cabin / 2009

View spec sheet →

Compare Caravelle 209 2000

See how this boat stacks up against similar models. Click any comparison to view a full side-by-side spec breakdown.

Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003 boat specs

Caravelle 209 2000 vs Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003

Caravelle vs Caravelle

View comparison →

Caravelle 242LS Bowrider 2006 boat specs

Caravelle 209 2000 vs Caravelle 242LS Bowrider 2006

Caravelle vs Caravelle

View comparison →

Caravelle 232 SS Bowrider 2006 boat specs

Caravelle 209 2000 vs Caravelle 232 SS Bowrider 2006

Caravelle vs Caravelle

View comparison →

Caravelle 209 2000 vs Caravelle 186 Bowrider 2006

Caravelle vs Caravelle

View comparison →

Caravelle 209 2000 vs Caravelle 192 SS Bowrider 2007

Caravelle vs Caravelle

View comparison →